Walking the Labyrinth

A Framework for Designing Inquiry-Based Expeditions

When we imagine planning an expedition, a project, or even a career step, it’s tempting to picture the path as a straight line: define the goal, create a plan, execute. But anyone who has actually walked such a journey knows it’s rarely so direct.

That’s why I turn to the metaphor of the labyrinth. Unlike a maze, a labyrinth isn’t about dead ends or wrong turns. There is only one path, and though it winds outward and inward, you always move toward the center. The gift of the labyrinth is that it reminds us: progress doesn’t mean walking straight ahead. Progress can mean circling back, pausing, or picking up new tools along the way.

For anyone embarking on an inquiry-driven expedition — whether it’s a research project, a service-learning program, or a self-designed summer of exploration — the labyrinth can serve as both metaphor and method.

Step 1: Glimpse the Center

Every journey starts with a vision, even if it’s fleeting. Write one sentence that captures your central purpose. For example:
“If my expedition does one thing well, it is…”

This is your north star, your “center.” Don’t worry if it feels fuzzy — clarity comes later.

Step 2: The Turn Outward

The labyrinth doesn’t take you straight to the middle; it pushes you outward first. That’s the part of the journey where doubt, unknowns, and questions surface. Ask yourself:

  • What don’t I know yet?
  • What feels unclear or intimidating?

Naming these uncertainties is not weakness — it’s the work. By acknowledging what’s missing, you create space to learn.

Step 3: Gather Your Tools

We rarely walk alone. Along the path, you’ll need tools — intellectual, relational, and practical — to carry inward. I like to divide them into four categories:

  • Conversations: mentors, peers, or communities to learn from
  • Concepts/Values: the principles that keep you aligned
  • Methods: research, mapping, storytelling, or observation techniques
  • Practices: reflection, rest, journaling, creative rituals that sustain you

Choose three to five. These will be your companions.

Step 4: Twists and Crossroads

No journey unfolds without barriers. Some are practical (time, funding, logistics). Others are external expectations — from family, institutions, or even society’s ideas about what you “should” do.

The regenerative approach isn’t to push through at all costs but to prepare alternate routes that still honor your purpose. Write a few if/then scenarios:

  • If not this location, then that one.
  • If not formal internship, then independent research or service.

Flexibility builds resilience.

Step 5: Return to the Center

Finally, revisit your original vision. With your tools, your unknowns, and your alternate paths in mind, rewrite it. Make it sharper, more grounded, more alive. You’re not back where you started — you’re back with new eyes.

Why the Labyrinth Matters

The labyrinth exercise is not about perfection. It’s about alignment. In regenerative leadership, we learn that when our values and our actions line up, our work nourishes us instead of depleting us. The labyrinth is a reminder that the path is rarely straight — but it is always meaningful.

So the next time you begin planning your inquiry-based expedition, don’t draw a checklist. Draw a labyrinth. Glimpse your center, name your unknowns, gather your tools, prepare your alternate routes, and walk with curiosity.

Because the truth is, the twists are not distractions from the journey — the twists are the journey.

For a short film exploring the labyrinth as guide, click here.

Learn, Unlearn, Relearn

 

This summer, I took part in the Global Citizenship Education course at the University for Peace (UPEACE), a United Nations–mandated institution dedicated to developing leaders who can build a more peaceful, just, and sustainable world. I am pursuing the Global Leadership Diploma through their Centre for Executive Education, and this was the second of five courses in that journey.

From the outset, I realized this course was different. It was not simply about learning the theory of global citizenship education (GCED). It was GCED in practice — modeled for us each week. Through interactive workshops, design-thinking activities, guest speakers, and sustained dialogue, we were not just studying global citizenship, we were living it together in community.

The most powerful dimension of the course was the exchange among participants from across the world. Each week we brought our lived experiences into the space: teachers, activists, administrators, peacebuilders, and learners representing diverse geographies, cultures, and perspectives. Theory never floated above reality; it was tested against stories from Ethiopia, Finland, Puerto Rico, Madagascar, Afghanistan, and beyond.

In that diversity, we were constantly reminded that everyone is both a teacher and a learner. This, for me, is the best part of UPEACE courses: the way they invite us into community, where knowledge flows in multiple directions and the classroom expands across borders.

Global citizenship education also requires unlearning: questioning the frameworks we inherit, recognizing Western-centrism and tokenism, and naming the power dynamics embedded in education itself. We explored empathy and cultural humility, critiques of soft GCE, and the tensions between local and global approaches.

These sessions challenged me to deepen the lexicon I use in my work. Words like empathy, humility, power, justice, accountability grew sharper in meaning through dialogue with others. Vocabulary is never just academic; it frames the way we act in the world.

At the same time, the course constantly turned us back toward practice. Weekly assignments weren’t afterthoughts; they were vehicles for integrating learning into our lives and work. Drafting vision statements, articulating challenge questions, and creating a personal manifesto pushed us to imagine how GCED might live in us as educators, leaders, or community members.

Here, GCED was not abstract. It was a lived pedagogy — a weaving together of head, heart, and hands. Knowledge and skills (cognitive), empathy and values (socio-emotional), and action (behavioral) came together.

If there is one reflection I carry forward, it is this: global citizenship is not a destination, but a cycle. To learn, unlearn, and relearn — again and again.

It sounds simple, but in practice it is profoundly demanding. To learn is to embrace complexity. To unlearn is to let go of frameworks and assumptions that no longer serve. To relearn is to weave new understandings into our lives and actions — anchored in justice, empathy, and sustainability.

Each turn of this cycle deepens our consciousness, sharpens our practice, and roots our commitments more firmly in care for both people and the planet. The lexicon expands, the meanings deepen, and we are reminded that global citizenship is not just something we teach, but something we become.

For me, the course also became a mirror for my ongoing work with The Geographical Imaginations Expedition & Institute (The GIEI). It sharpened my vision of how mapping, storytelling, and inquiry can move beyond “soft” global citizenship toward praxis — where ethos and action are inseparable.

This is the ongoing challenge: how to design learning expeditions that invite learners to see the world, and themselves within it, with renewed consciousness and responsibility. To keep cycling through learn–unlearn–relearn as a lifelong practice.

To the UPEACE team, my fellow participants, and our guest educators: thank you for creating a space that was equal parts challenging, compassionate, and inspiring. The course didn’t just teach global citizenship education — it modeled it, showing us what it can look like when lived in community.

The seeds we planted together will continue to grow, in classrooms, communities, and collaborations around the world.

Incubating Change

 

When an idea is still a seed, it needs the right conditions to grow: time, structure, support, and challenge. That’s what an incubator provides — a space where fragile beginnings can take root, where ideas can be tested, stretched, and prepared for the world.

This summer, I found myself in such an incubator: the Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Social Change course at the University for Peace (UPEACE), a United Nations–mandated institution dedicated to developing leaders who can build a more peaceful, just, and sustainable world. I am pursuing the Global Leadership Diploma through their Centre for Executive Education.

Over several weeks, I joined peers from across the globe — educators, activists, entrepreneurs, and dreamers — each carrying a different seed of an idea. Some arrived with projects already sprouting. Others carried only whispers, questions, or sparks of inspiration. Together, we entered a structured, challenging, and supportive environment designed to help our ideas grow.

 

The first thing we were asked to do was deceptively simple: write our mission statement in just eight words.

It was harder than it looked. How do you distill complexity into clarity? How do you pare down all the nuance, passion, and ambition of a project into a single line that still carries weight?

This exercise set the tone. Incubation wasn’t about fluffing ideas up. It was about stripping them down, examining their core, and making sure they could stand on their own.

From there, the course took us through a series of building blocks:

  • Drafting theories of change — mapping how activities connect to outputs, outcomes, and long-term impact.
  • Exploring legal structures for social enterprises — weighing the tradeoffs of nonprofit, for-profit, and hybrid models.
  • Developing business models and lean budgets — ensuring that inspiring visions could also be viable in practice.
  • Practicing the art of the 60-second pitch — learning how to tell a story that opens hearts and opens doors.

Each week built upon the last, and each assignment pushed us further into the real work of turning vision into strategy.

Learning in Community

No incubator works in isolation. The most powerful part of this course was the community itself.

Our cohort represented a tapestry of contexts and causes: a cultural hub in Thailand, women’s empowerment projects in Central America, climate initiatives in Africa, youth education ventures in Europe and beyond. Each week, we shared not only progress but also struggles.

When one participant questioned how to sustain her organization without donor fatigue, others offered models they had tried. When another wrestled with impact measurement, the group provided tools and examples.

The course reminded me that social change does not emerge alone. It grows through dialogue, cross-pollination, and the courage to share half-formed ideas in a supportive environment.

Applying the Lessons: GIEI 2.0

For me, the incubator experience crystallized around the next phase of my own work: The Geographical Imaginations Expedition & Institute (GIEI).

The GIEI has long been a space where storytelling, geography, and community engagement intersect — through podcasts, mapping projects, and learning expeditions. But much of it had remained a side initiative alongside full-time teaching. Entering the course, I had a vision for GIEI 2.0, one that could evolve into a nonprofit dedicated to global citizenship education.

By the end of the course, that seed had sprouted into something tangible.  The course gave me not only tools but also confidence: a sense that GIEI 2.0 is not just ambitious, but actionable.

Lessons that Will Stay With Me

Looking back, three lessons from the incubator stand out most:

  1. Story as a Vehicle for Change
    Every venture, no matter how technical, must carry a compelling narrative. Data alone doesn’t move people. Stories do. The course pushed me to translate abstract global statistics into human-scale metaphors — to help others see the world differently.
  2. Sustainability Beyond Finances
    We tend to equate sustainability with survival. But the course reframed it: sustainability is about alignment. The right legal structure, funding model, and organizational design must not only keep the lights on but also reinforce the mission and values.
  3. Community as Curriculum
    The richness of the course came not just from lectures or readings but from the cohort itself. The exchanges, feedback and stories shared became part of the curriculum. The incubator worked because it was populated with diverse, passionate learners willing to listen as much as they spoke.

Looking Ahead

As I step out of this incubator, I do so with both a project in motion and a renewed sense of purpose.

The journey of GIEI 2.0 continues — with the creation of interactive learning tools, workshops, and, eventually, immersive residencies. But beyond that, I carry forward the conviction that entrepreneurship is not just about starting businesses. It is about cultivating imagination, empathy, and resilience — qualities the world urgently needs.

It is about daring to ask:

  • What if we built economies that measured well-being instead of profit?
  • What if education prepared us to collaborate as global citizens, not just compete as individuals?
  • What if leadership was defined by empathy, not power?
  • What if progress meant leaving no one — and no place — behind?

The Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Social Change course reminded me that these questions are not naive. They are necessary.

And perhaps most importantly, it reminded me that I am not working alone. Across continents and disciplines, a generation of changemakers is already incubating their own seeds of change — each distinct, but growing together into something far greater than the sum of its parts.

If you are carrying an idea — whether it’s fully formed or just a whisper — I can’t recommend this course (or one like it) enough. It offers more than knowledge. It offers incubation: a structured, supportive space to test, refine, and prepare your vision for the world.

For me, it was the start of a new chapter. For all of us, it was a reminder that while the world’s population is vast at 8 billion, when reimagined as a village of 100 people — or experienced as a cohort of 25 — it becomes a place where we can truly begin to know one another.

And from there, begin to build a shared future.

Living, Learning, and Leading in Granada

This summer, I had the privilege of co-leading The Experiment in International Living’s Leadership Institute: Spanish Language & Community Engagement in Spain, a program that brought together 16 high school students from the U.S. and 18 from Spain for an unforgettable journey in Granada.

From the start, this program was built on four pillars: peer-to-peer exchange, language immersion, social change, and community service. In practice, that meant living together in a residencia during the week, staying with host families on weekends, sharing meals, navigating city streets, and constantly learning from one another — not only through organized activities, but through countless small moments of connection.

Building Connections Across Cultures

U.S. and Spanish high school students lived, learned, and led together — exploring each other’s cultures, building friendships, and practicing cross-cultural competency through real-life connections. The peer-to-peer aspect of the program was its heartbeat: informal conversations in the residencia, shared laughter during meals, and moments of mutual curiosity helped bridge languages and perspectives.

Language immersion came alive not only in the classroom but in the market, on walking tours, during late-night group conversations, and through family life in Granada. Students had to navigate both linguistic challenges and cultural nuances — gaining skills they’ll carry for a lifetime.

Dialogue as a Tool for Leadership

On our final full day together, we culminated in a youth-led round robin of dialogues. Six stations invited mixed U.S. and Spanish groups to explore:

  • Youth Voice & Social Change

  • Mental Health, Pressure & Coping

  • Creativity, Identity & Expression

  • Global Citizenship

  • Cultural Missteps & What We Learn from Them

  • Friendship & Connection Across Differences

It was inspiring to watch participants not only share their own perspectives but listen deeply to those of their peers. These conversations modeled the kind of engaged, respectful dialogue that is too often missing in our world — and reminded me that leadership can be built one conversation at a time.

Bringing It Home

The program doesn’t end in Spain. Each U.S. participant will now return home with ideas for Community-Based Initiatives — projects rooted in their local communities but informed by their time in Granada. Whether it’s starting a club, organizing an event, or launching a campaign, they’ll bring forward the empathy, global awareness, and problem-solving skills they cultivated here.

As for me — from the U.S. but living in Spain full-time — I am afforded a unique window into the cultural exchange happening between our students. I often told the group that we, as leaders, were also on our own Experiment exchange — learning alongside them and building bridges in real time.

Granada gave us more than a backdrop. It gave us a shared space to live out the ideals of The Experiment: connecting deeply, thinking critically, and leading with heart.

Roots in the Sky: Returning to The Fountain in Granada

There are films you return to not for plot, but for weather—for their atmosphere, their gravity, their pull on your interior tides. Darren Aronofsky’s The Fountain is one of those films for me. I’ve seen it at least ten times. Each time, I enter its spiral a little differently. Each time, it offers something else.

This time, I watched it in Granada.

Not in a theater—just me, a screen, and the layered hum of a city that refuses to stay in one time–unless, of course, you ignore that palimpsest. I’ve walked through the Albaicín, traced the patterned shadows in the Alhambra, listened to church bells echo through streets once shaped by mosques. Granada is a city that doesn’t forget. It blurs. It folds time inward. And so does The Fountain.

Watching it here, something shifted.

Where You Are Shapes What You See

I’ve always believed that place changes how we experience a film. There are movies that resonate because of when you see them—but others because of where.

Watch Talk to Her in Madrid and it becomes a meditation on distance.
Watch Pan’s Labyrinth in Segovia and the stones seem to whisper Franco’s afterlife.
Watch The Spirit of the Beehive in Castilla and the earth itself feels hollowed out by silence.

And watching The Fountain in Granada?

It felt inevitable. Not like discovering something new, but like opening a letter I’d kept folded for years.

A Familiar Spiral, Seen from a New Angle

I know this film. I know its cuts, its rhythms, its grief. I know the way Izzi smiles in the snow, the way Tom trembles with denial, the way the star—Xibalba—burns with something more than light.

But here in Granada, surrounded by centuries of conquest, devotion, beauty, and erasure, the film felt different. It didn’t just move through time—it held it. It mirrored this place where empires once chased permanence and instead found decay. Where a civilization imagined itself eternal, and was turned into ornament.

The film’s refusal to separate love from death, empire from myth, felt at home here.

Izzi and Isabel

There’s a detail I’d noticed before, but never felt quite as sharply: the Queen in Izzi’s novel-in-progress shares her name—Isabel. In the film, she’s regal, serene, sending her conquistador to find the Tree of Life in Yucatán. In real history, Queen Isabel of Castile sent explorers westward for her own tree: legacy, salvation, dominion.

And Izzi—Rachel Weisz’s Izzi—is dying, but she’s the only one at peace. She understands that death is not the enemy. It is her partner who can’t accept it, who rages and clings and unravels.

Two Izzis. Two Isabellas. One seeks transcendence through conquest. The other, through surrender.

Granada, once ruled by Isabel the Queen, becomes a strange echo chamber for this film. The question lingers: What is the cost of trying to outrun death?

The Tree, the Star, the Stone

The Tree of Life sits at the center of all three timelines in the film—rooted in the past, glowing in the future, decaying in the present. It offers healing. It demands sacrifice. It transcends.

Here in Granada, trees hold history too. The olive, the cypress, the orange blossom. They survive regimes. They outlast architecture. In the gardens of the Generalife, they feel like quiet gods.

And then there’s stone. The stones that built this city, that carry verses and scars. The kind of stones that outlive their makers, but not their meanings.

The film asks: can you live forever through what you build, what you love, what you plant?  Granada doesn’t answer. But it gestures. It points to the ruins, and then to the sky.

Death Is the Road to Awe

There’s a line I’ve always carried from The Fountain:  “Death is the road to awe.”

In Granada, that line stops being metaphor.

Here, we might think of everything as awe. The light on tiled walls. The curve of an arch built for vanished prayers. The hush of twilight in a square where languages once braided together.

But everything is death, too. Not as absence, but as transformation. This city isn’t preserved—it’s composted. Its beauty is rooted in what it’s lost, what it’s blended, what it’s become.

This time, I didn’t watch The Fountain to understand it.  I watched it to stand inside it. And Granada made that possible.

 

#   #   #

 

After ten viewings, I thought I knew The Fountain. But Granada taught me otherwise.

Some films are just films.  Others become companions—haunting you, changing with you, asking new questions as your surroundings shift.  Here, The Fountain wasn’t about escaping death.  It was about learning to carry time—in your breath, in your grief, in the trees you plant knowing they’ll outlive you.  

And in that, it felt like a conversation with this city.  One rooted in the soil. One burning in the stars.